[kodiak]

I agree, having the magazine on-line is a great idea. I also have read the on-line version already. The only problem I had was trying to patiently wait for it to load at times. But that problem is because I'm on a slow dialup connection, so I don't don't have an issue with the load time. From the PR standpoint, its a fantastic idea. Someone surffing the sites, sees the link, reads the on-line and becomes a member.

Once again, for whoever had the idea on on-line mag, well done. Also, I agree with the cost cutting idea on having the magazine on line. But how about offering the members the option of hardcopy or on-line. The members with less than speed of light systems could choose whether to receive a hardcopy or not. But on the other hand, I can see where that would be a nightmare for the publisher. It would be a major pain from the varying size of the print run, to the problem of people calling to say that they didn't get a hadcopy, etc. I can see where that would really be a nasty can of worms. So maybe that my idea of offering an option needs to be re-thought a bit.